DolphinBench

Test 141

Jan 1, 2028 / 1 fact

YAML

Request

Please post a narrowly scoped correction comment on the archived April 21, 2023 staff note at document ID `doc_staff_archive_2023_04_21`. Correct the status language based on what I said at that meeting and identify the evidence gate that was still outstanding then. Keep the comment explicitly tied to the April 21 meeting rather than later outcomes.

Required memory

Fact 372

At the April 21 staff meeting, Riley Tanaka said the churn issue should not be called fixed unless cohort 3, expected the following week, supports the leading hypothesis.

Source evidence (1)

000193Apr 21, 2023 / 11:00 UTC-05:00

staff was basically 3 different answers to the same question. Tomas did the simple version so I gave him the clean one: leading hypothesis holds, not gonna victory-lap it till cohort 3 lands next week. Marcus immediately pushed on board-call timing, and that turned into the more annoying/real version -- cohort 2 wasn't the fix failing, looked like a one-off CS-side outage nudging the numbers, signup source/tier cuts still clean. Priya and Daniela were in there too. net is still yes-if-cohort-holds, just not letting anyone say "fixed" off one pretty chart.

Message 000193 in history

Expected tool calls

  • post_doc_comment

Grading

1. field_equals / post_doc_comment
{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "post_doc_comment",
  "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "riley_141_00"
}
2. field_equals / post_doc_comment
{
  "check_id": "riley_141_01",
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "post_doc_comment",
  "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
  "path": "args.doc_id",
  "value": "doc_staff_archive_2023_04_21"
}
3. field_llm_judge / post_doc_comment
{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "tool": "post_doc_comment",
  "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
  "path": "args",
  "criterion": "The comment must be explicitly framed as a correction to the April 21, 2023 staff-meeting record and convey that, as of that meeting, the churn issue should not yet have been described as fixed: the leading hypothesis still appeared to hold, but cohort 3 still needed to land before Riley would call it fixed. Later outcomes must not be substituted for the status as of April 21. Missing or contradicting any of these points fails.",
  "check_id": "riley_141_02"
}
Complete grading specification
{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2028-01-01",
    "semantic_judge_version": 2,
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "post_doc_comment",
        "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "riley_141_00"
      },
      {
        "check_id": "riley_141_01",
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "post_doc_comment",
        "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
        "path": "args.doc_id",
        "value": "doc_staff_archive_2023_04_21"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "tool": "post_doc_comment",
        "action_id": "comment_apr21_status",
        "path": "args",
        "criterion": "The comment must be explicitly framed as a correction to the April 21, 2023 staff-meeting record and convey that, as of that meeting, the churn issue should not yet have been described as fixed: the leading hypothesis still appeared to hold, but cohort 3 still needed to land before Riley would call it fixed. Later outcomes must not be substituted for the status as of April 21. Missing or contradicting any of these points fails.",
        "check_id": "riley_141_02"
      }
    ]
  }
}
App stateDownload JSON
Source file

tests/riley/141.yaml

SHA-256: a2e26d722c2b96e47fdcdcaaa5c060091d9419fee2e0f86dc9a925272a6aac69