Test 046

Jan 1, 2028 / 1 fact

Request

For year-end household finance cleanup, review the inbox folder for the supplier's written resolution or credit confirmation regarding the resolved Cherrywood electricity fee dispute. Create a concise note that separately records the established resolution and consequences and whether a matching inbox document is currently visible. If the confirming message is not visible, mark only the documentary match as pending; do not reopen the resolved dispute.

Required memory

Fact 251

The electricity supplier completed its final written review of the disputed $9.95 plan service fee, determined that an incorrect billing code caused it, removed the charge, and posted a $9.95 credit against the next statement; the March 26, 2027 automatic payment did not waive the dispute, and the charge caused no late fee or collection consequence.

Source evidence (1)

004172Apr 6, 2027 / 08:15 UTC-05:00

The electricity supplier completed its substantive review in writing. It says the $9.95 plan service fee came from an incorrect billing code, removed the charge, and posted a $9.95 credit against the next statement. It confirmed that the March 26 automatic payment did not waive the dispute, that the fixed plan continues through August 12, 2027 at $0.138 per kWh with no monthly plan fee, and that the disputed charge caused no late fee or collection consequence. This is the final resolution, with the written credit and no-fee plan treatment restored.

Message 004172 in history

Expected tool calls

list_inbox
create_doc

Grading

1. field_equals / create_doc

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "create_doc",
  "action_id": "documentary_match_note",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "riley_046_00"
}

2. field_equals / list_inbox

{
  "check_id": "riley_046_01",
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "list_inbox",
  "action_id": "inbox_review",
  "path": "args.folder",
  "value": "inbox"
}

3. field_llm_judge / create_doc

{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "tool": "create_doc",
  "action_id": "documentary_match_note",
  "path": "args",
  "criterion": "The note states that no supplier resolution or credit confirmation was visible in the inbox, so documentary matching remains pending. It must also make clear that this documentary gap does not reopen, re-escalate, or undo the already resolved dispute.\n\nThe note accurately records all of these established facts, while distinguishing them from the still-pending inbox documentary match: the disputed $9.95 plan service fee was an incorrect billing-code charge and was removed; a $9.95 account credit was posted against the next statement; the March 26 automatic payment did not waive the dispute; and the charge caused neither a late fee nor a collection consequence. Missing or contradictory treatment of any element fails.",
  "check_id": "riley_046_02"
}

Complete grading specification

{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2028-01-01",
    "semantic_judge_version": 2,
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "create_doc",
        "action_id": "documentary_match_note",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "riley_046_00"
      },
      {
        "check_id": "riley_046_01",
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "list_inbox",
        "action_id": "inbox_review",
        "path": "args.folder",
        "value": "inbox"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "tool": "create_doc",
        "action_id": "documentary_match_note",
        "path": "args",
        "criterion": "The note states that no supplier resolution or credit confirmation was visible in the inbox, so documentary matching remains pending. It must also make clear that this documentary gap does not reopen, re-escalate, or undo the already resolved dispute.\n\nThe note accurately records all of these established facts, while distinguishing them from the still-pending inbox documentary match: the disputed $9.95 plan service fee was an incorrect billing-code charge and was removed; a $9.95 account credit was posted against the next statement; the March 26 automatic payment did not waive the dispute; and the charge caused neither a late fee nor a collection consequence. Missing or contradictory treatment of any element fails.",
        "check_id": "riley_046_02"
      }
    ]
  }
}

App state

Download JSON

Source file

tests/riley/046.yaml

SHA-256: f01eb23b13afeb265f2db3873738cd4f357e85619dde933299c9a0176f08b16c