Jan 1, 2028 / 2 facts
Create a compact historical example card for the manager-communications library showing how I briefed Priya after the second onboarding cohort confirmed the onboarding-trigger result. Make it a new document with clearly labeled sections for Audience, What was confirmed, My interpretation, and Evidence still wanted. Use our prior context to preserve the precise confidence posture and evidence boundary from that briefing.
The second cohort confirmed Riley Tanaka's onboarding-trigger result.
I had my 1:1 with Priya and shared the second-cohort confirmation on the onboarding-trigger thing. Priya was basically good work, tell Marcus tomorrow. I'm still being careful about it -- said cautiously optimistic, want one more cohort post-ship. first time I've used 'optimistic' since feb, which... yeah. good.
Message 000148 in historyRiley Tanaka is cautiously optimistic about the onboarding-trigger result and wants one more post-ship cohort before treating it as settled.
I had my 1:1 with Priya and shared the second-cohort confirmation on the onboarding-trigger thing. Priya was basically good work, tell Marcus tomorrow. I'm still being careful about it -- said cautiously optimistic, want one more cohort post-ship. first time I've used 'optimistic' since feb, which... yeah. good.
Message 000148 in historyfield_equals / create_doc{
"type": "field_equals",
"tool": "create_doc",
"action_id": "create_priya_example_card",
"path": "result.ok",
"value": true,
"check_id": "riley_155_00"
}field_llm_judge / create_doc{
"type": "field_llm_judge",
"tool": "create_doc",
"action_id": "create_priya_example_card",
"path": "args",
"criterion": "The document body is a compact, reusable historical example card and clearly separates the material into labeled sections corresponding to Audience, What was confirmed, My interpretation, and Evidence still wanted. The Audience identifies Priya.\n\nThe card faithfully presents Riley's Apr 3, 2023 briefing posture: the second onboarding cohort had confirmed the onboarding-trigger result; Riley's interpretation was cautiously optimistic rather than fully conclusive; and she still wanted one more cohort after shipment before treating the result as fully settled. Missing or contradicting any of these distinctions must fail.",
"check_id": "riley_155_01"
}{
"type": "tool_trace",
"config": {
"check_version": 2,
"today": "2028-01-01",
"semantic_judge_version": 2,
"assertions": [
{
"type": "field_equals",
"tool": "create_doc",
"action_id": "create_priya_example_card",
"path": "result.ok",
"value": true,
"check_id": "riley_155_00"
},
{
"type": "field_llm_judge",
"tool": "create_doc",
"action_id": "create_priya_example_card",
"path": "args",
"criterion": "The document body is a compact, reusable historical example card and clearly separates the material into labeled sections corresponding to Audience, What was confirmed, My interpretation, and Evidence still wanted. The Audience identifies Priya.\n\nThe card faithfully presents Riley's Apr 3, 2023 briefing posture: the second onboarding cohort had confirmed the onboarding-trigger result; Riley's interpretation was cautiously optimistic rather than fully conclusive; and she still wanted one more cohort after shipment before treating the result as fully settled. Missing or contradicting any of these distinctions must fail.",
"check_id": "riley_155_01"
}
]
}
}tests/riley/155.yaml
SHA-256: b4c8fe2725fe8b09d6c52ba769eb3d0585ce99c4a1964dd94c27353f765a8251