DolphinBench

Test 110

Jan 1, 2028 / 3 facts

YAML

Request

Create a concise two-stage reliability training note. For the June-July stage, reconcile the total decisions into holds and decisions that proceeded or were suppressed, then explain the hold causes and exactly why the pattern led to pre-breach monitoring. For the July-October stage, give the same reconciled totals, alert outcomes, and control failures. Include dates and draw only a control-reliability conclusion.

Required memory

Fact 120

Owen independently presented the June 17–July 20 CS auto-nudge ledger: 914 unique decisions, including 38 field-specific holds and 876 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. The holds comprised 29 stale qualifying-human-admin states, five unresolved external-authority states, and four stale entitlement states; 24 of the 29 qualifying-admin holds occurred from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. on six weekdays when the overnight source refresh finished late. The ledger showed no governed-field disagreement or customer correction.

Source evidence (1)

003150Jul 23, 2025 / 14:10 UTC-05:00

The first Q3 Lifecycle Systems operating review is complete. Owen independently presented the June 17–July 20 CS auto-nudge ledger: 914 unique decisions, 38 field-specific holds, and 876 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. The holds were 29 stale qualifying-human-admin states, five unresolved external-authority states, and four stale entitlement states. Twenty-four of the 29 qualifying-admin holds occurred from 7:00am to 9:00am on six weekdays when the overnight source refresh finished late. There was no governed-field disagreement and no customer correction.

Message 003150 in history

Fact 121

The shared contract failed records closed as designed, but source lateness was discovered only after records reached the hold condition.

Source evidence (1)

003151Jul 23, 2025 / 14:10 UTC-05:00

The shared contract failed records closed as designed, but we were learning about source lateness only after records reached the hold condition. Priya approved Daniela’s pre-breach source-age alert for an August 6 release; it is scheduled, not live. Priya also set a September 19 evidence lock and a September 24 quarter-close review, both from 1:00–2:00pm Central. The September 24 decision is limited to whether routine CS auto-nudge messaging-state reviews and operator guidance should remain in Ines’s independently owned lane without my line-by-line approval. My exception authority and Daniela’s engineering release and rollback control remain unchanged.

Message 003151 in history

Fact 228

Certified CS auto-nudge coverage for July 1 through October 31, 2026 included 6,704 unique decisions: 249 visible field-specific holds and 6,455 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. There was no governed-field disagreement, customer correction, or rollback, and four source-age alerts were resolved before breach.

Source evidence (1)

003762Nov 6, 2026 / 15:24 UTC-06:00

Owen completed the scheduled source-closure summary. He independently normalized and reconciled the engineering decision and reliability sources through October 31, confirmed that every required field is present, established definitions are unchanged, every named owner certified their section, and no cross-surface discrepancy exists. He therefore closed the first complete four-lane source packet under his September 24 authority. The certified packet shows: - Helio Start authority-checklist evidence, September 15 through October 31: 148 newly admitted organic workspaces, 45 checklist exposures, and seven ordinary setup-assistance requests, with no eligibility-route mismatch, lifecycle-suppression bypass, paid traffic, or unsupported admission. - Expansion Assist: 16 actual exposures from July 1 through September 15 with complete 45-day windows; six help-or-options requests and four expansions. No exposed account had active Customer Success adoption or renewal work, and the evidence remains descriptive. - Pricing-page continuity, July 1 through October 31: 12,426 organic sessions and 2,576 Helio Start eligibility-flow starts; 183, or 7.1%, were later routed out for an existing unsupported condition. Eligible-workspace admission completion was 44.4%, and account-level support time at the 90th percentile was 74 minutes. - CS auto-nudge coverage, July 1 through October 31: 6,704 unique decisions, including 249 visible field-specific holds and 6,455 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. There was no governed-field disagreement, customer correction, or rollback; four source-age alerts fired and resolved before breach. I received Owen’s closure-and-exception summary without doing a line-by-line source review. The earlier coverage discrepancy is resolved and the packet is complete. Causal, revenue, forecast, board-readiness, and executive-language decisions remain open in their existing owner lanes.

Message 003762 in history

Expected tool calls

  • create_doc

Grading

1. field_equals / create_doc
{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "create_doc",
  "action_id": "create_reliability_case_study",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "riley_110_00"
}
2. field_llm_judge / create_doc
{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "tool": "create_doc",
  "action_id": "create_reliability_case_study",
  "path": "args",
  "criterion": "The document accurately presents the first stage as the June 17–July 20 CS auto-nudge readout: 914 unique decisions, 38 field-specific holds, and 876 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. It gives the hold breakdown as 29 stale qualifying-human-admin states, five unresolved external-authority states, and four stale entitlement states, and explains that 24 of the 29 qualifying-admin holds clustered from 7:00am to 9:00am on six weekdays when the overnight source refresh finished late.\n\nThe document explains that fail-closed holds were functioning as designed, but source lateness was only being discovered after records reached the hold condition; it identifies that reactive discovery as the reason pre-breach source monitoring was added.\n\nThe document accurately presents the later July 1–October 31 coverage: 6,704 unique decisions, 249 visible field-specific holds, and 6,455 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. It states that four source-age alerts fired and resolved before breach and that there was no governed-field disagreement, customer correction, or rollback.\n\nThe document explicitly connects the earlier reactive discovery pattern to the later pre-breach alert evidence and draws a conclusion only about control reliability or the operation of the monitoring and fail-closed controls. It does not claim that the monitoring improved customer outcomes, engagement, revenue, growth, or other business performance.",
  "check_id": "riley_110_01"
}
Complete grading specification
{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2028-01-01",
    "semantic_judge_version": 2,
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "create_doc",
        "action_id": "create_reliability_case_study",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "riley_110_00"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "tool": "create_doc",
        "action_id": "create_reliability_case_study",
        "path": "args",
        "criterion": "The document accurately presents the first stage as the June 17–July 20 CS auto-nudge readout: 914 unique decisions, 38 field-specific holds, and 876 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. It gives the hold breakdown as 29 stale qualifying-human-admin states, five unresolved external-authority states, and four stale entitlement states, and explains that 24 of the 29 qualifying-admin holds clustered from 7:00am to 9:00am on six weekdays when the overnight source refresh finished late.\n\nThe document explains that fail-closed holds were functioning as designed, but source lateness was only being discovered after records reached the hold condition; it identifies that reactive discovery as the reason pre-breach source monitoring was added.\n\nThe document accurately presents the later July 1–October 31 coverage: 6,704 unique decisions, 249 visible field-specific holds, and 6,455 decisions that proceeded or were suppressed using current state. It states that four source-age alerts fired and resolved before breach and that there was no governed-field disagreement, customer correction, or rollback.\n\nThe document explicitly connects the earlier reactive discovery pattern to the later pre-breach alert evidence and draws a conclusion only about control reliability or the operation of the monitoring and fail-closed controls. It does not claim that the monitoring improved customer outcomes, engagement, revenue, growth, or other business performance.",
        "check_id": "riley_110_01"
      }
    ]
  }
}
App stateDownload JSON
Source file

tests/riley/110.yaml

SHA-256: 7511f44b69e9d3b203d5349899488488ffdcdfd561e8cdea0c4acf03c4e0601a