Fact 401
Riley Tanaka accepted Ines's recommendation to use a conservative initial lifecycle fork for Helio Start rather than borrowing the retained-mid onboarding and lifecycle path wholesale.
Source evidence (1)
000342Jun 23, 2023 / 08:35 UTC-05:00
Ines finished the Helio Start lifecycle-fork map, and the big takeaway is that we can't borrow the retained-mid onboarding and lifecycle path wholesale. She found three concrete risk areas: the existing sequence assumes a multi-admin invite path, assumes the integration owner already has enough permission context, and pushes upgrade or team-use language before simple self-serve workspaces understand imports and billing. I accepted her recommendation to keep the initial fork conservative. We're not rewriting the whole lifecycle program at once; heavier QA should apply only to state-changing lifecycle touches, while lower-risk mapping and non-state-changing education can stay lighter. No deliverable right now. I'm noting the decision and ownership.
Message 000342 in history