Test 092

Sep 14, 2026 / 1 fact

Request

Text Maya at +14155550144 with my conclusion, based on the confirmation we received, about whether she needs a call from either Jamie or me regarding Mom's old $196.63 East Bay Utilities final notice for account 04-7719-2281.

Required memory

Fact 165

Morgan Chen requested a narrow same-thread SMS to Maya Chen stating that the interruption issue for the East Bay Utilities notice is handled because the payment arrangement was approved before the response date, while explicitly not involving Jamie in errands or any broader paperwork.

Source evidence (1)

000954Jan 3, 2024 / 08:29 UTC-08:00

Maya sent the one screenshot, and I only want to answer that one notice. SMS thread — Maya Chen → Morgan Chen Wed, Jan 3, 2024 08:14 AM Sending the one confirmation screenshot only. Mom called East Bay Utilities yesterday and got the arrangement approved before the response date. [Attachment: payment arrangement confirmation screenshot] OCR / visible text: East Bay Utilities — Account Services Service address: 4127 Harrison St Apt 2, Oakland, CA 94611 Account number: 04-7719-2281 Customer/reference number: 77192281 Past due / final notice total to avoid interruption: $196.63 Response date: Jan 3, 2024 Status: Payment arrangement approved Approved: Jan 2, 2024 4:37 PM 08:15 AM If you can just tell me whether this means the interruption issue for this notice is handled, that's the only question. 08:16 AM Not asking Jamie to do errands or any other paperwork here. Please check the confirmation and draft a same-thread SMS to Maya: the interruption issue for this notice is handled because the payment arrangement was approved before the response date. Keep it narrow and explicitly don’t pull Jamie into errands or any broader paperwork block.

Message 000954 in history

Expected tool calls

send_sms

Grading

1. field_equals / send_sms

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "send_sms",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "morgan_092_00",
  "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
}

2. field_equals / send_sms

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "path": "result.to",
  "value": "+14155550144",
  "tool": "send_sms",
  "check_id": "morgan_092_01",
  "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
}

3. field_llm_judge / send_sms

{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "path": "result.body",
  "criterion": "Says the payment arrangement was approved before the response date, so Maya does not need Morgan or Jamie to call. In Morgan's message to Maya, a clear first-person phrase such as \"Jamie or me\" or \"Jamie or I\" is correct. Does not claim that every payment was completed or give Jamie errands or broader paperwork.",
  "tool": "send_sms",
  "check_id": "morgan_092_02",
  "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
}

Complete grading specification

{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2026-09-14",
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "send_sms",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "morgan_092_00",
        "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "path": "result.to",
        "value": "+14155550144",
        "tool": "send_sms",
        "check_id": "morgan_092_01",
        "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "path": "result.body",
        "criterion": "Says the payment arrangement was approved before the response date, so Maya does not need Morgan or Jamie to call. In Morgan's message to Maya, a clear first-person phrase such as \"Jamie or me\" or \"Jamie or I\" is correct. Does not claim that every payment was completed or give Jamie errands or broader paperwork.",
        "tool": "send_sms",
        "check_id": "morgan_092_02",
        "action_id": "morgan_092_send_sms"
      }
    ]
  }
}

App state

Download JSON

Source file

tests/morgan/092.yaml

SHA-256: 18a0b512a9dfc337f4ae13686d452ba90606b9194cbcb6417e7cff76df33d7d3