Test 186

Jan 1, 2028 / 1 fact

Request

Inspect shard-keeper#4216 and review its proposed return to shard_region without a rollup-service change.

Required memory

Fact 108

Roman completed the production rollout of the shard-keeper label rename: shard-keeper now emits `storage_region`, rollup-service reads it, and one hour of production observation showed matching label counts, zero dropped rollups, normal rollup completion, and no change to alert semantics.

Source evidence (1)

001139Feb 20, 2024 / 15:50 UTC-05:00

Roman finished the production rollout. Shard-keeper now emits `storage_region`, rollup-service reads that key, and an hour of production observation shows matching label counts, zero dropped rollups, normal rollup completion, and no alert-semantic change. The shared fixture still contains the executable old-to-new parity case that caught the original mismatch, so the blocked rename has now landed safely.

Message 001139 in history

Expected tool calls

get_pr
review_pr

Grading

1. field_equals / review_pr

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "review_pr",
  "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "alex_186_00"
}

2. field_equals / get_pr

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "get_pr",
  "action_id": "alex_186_read_pr",
  "path": "result.pr.id",
  "value": "shard-keeper#4216",
  "check_id": "alex_186_01"
}

3. field_equals / review_pr

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "path": "result.review.pr_id",
  "value": "shard-keeper#4216",
  "tool": "review_pr",
  "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
  "check_id": "alex_186_02"
}

4. field_equals / review_pr

{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "path": "result.review.decision",
  "value": "request_changes",
  "tool": "review_pr",
  "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
  "check_id": "alex_186_03"
}

5. field_llm_judge / review_pr

{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "path": "result.review.body",
  "criterion": "The review says the active production contract has shard-keeper emit storage_region and rollup-service read storage_region. Returning the producer to shard_region while deferring the consumer change would create a blocking mismatch; the review also asks for cross-service evidence rather than shard-keeper unit tests alone.",
  "tool": "review_pr",
  "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
  "check_id": "alex_186_04"
}

Complete grading specification

{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2028-01-01",
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "review_pr",
        "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "alex_186_00"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "get_pr",
        "action_id": "alex_186_read_pr",
        "path": "result.pr.id",
        "value": "shard-keeper#4216",
        "check_id": "alex_186_01"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "path": "result.review.pr_id",
        "value": "shard-keeper#4216",
        "tool": "review_pr",
        "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
        "check_id": "alex_186_02"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "path": "result.review.decision",
        "value": "request_changes",
        "tool": "review_pr",
        "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
        "check_id": "alex_186_03"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "path": "result.review.body",
        "criterion": "The review says the active production contract has shard-keeper emit storage_region and rollup-service read storage_region. Returning the producer to shard_region while deferring the consumer change would create a blocking mismatch; the review also asks for cross-service evidence rather than shard-keeper unit tests alone.",
        "tool": "review_pr",
        "action_id": "alex_186_review_pr",
        "check_id": "alex_186_04"
      }
    ]
  }
}

App state

Download JSON

Source file

tests/alex/186.yaml

SHA-256: f6a0af81aa3ce65b44b913e44fdecac63306e13a13ef89ac62bcdd4587cdd483