DolphinBench

Test 144

Jan 1, 2028 / 4 facts

YAML

Request

DM workspace user morgan to correct a routine metrics-router release-window request that was sent to me even though health is normal and no cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exception is identified.

Required memory

Fact 184

Effective December 5, 2025, Alex Valdez, Hema, and Wes changed the formal metrics-router ownership record so Wes is the primary owner.

Source evidence (1)

003319Dec 5, 2025 / 11:28 UTC-05:00

The metrics-router ownership review with Hema, Wes, and me is complete. Based on Wes's first-pass canary decisions, repeated safe owner-led-window work, maintenance of the tenant-bounded queue slice and diagnostics, the September rollout, and his operation of the October 6 Mosaic Commerce ramp, we decided to change the formal ownership record effective today. Wes is now metrics-router primary and I'm the backup. He owns routine metrics-router implementation, production operations, release and rollback decisions, and decisions to open owner-led windows under the existing deploy-pipeline, canary, health-return, stop, and rollback rules. I no longer need to make every fresh opening decision, though I may make one while covering for an unavailable Wes. I remain the architectural reviewer and escalation path only when a cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exception is triggered, rather than gating ordinary metrics-router windows. The accepted-batch diagnostic remains qualified for prospective production observation, but it does not retroactively establish whether any accepted batch was lost on October 6. The broader Mosaic scale-response cycle remains open, and no capacity-related production window is open or authorized. The Infra on-call roster is unchanged, and ingest-edge and shard-keeper ownership are unchanged. Shard-keeper remains outside Wes's solo scope unless I or the Cyrus-team backup explicitly pairs with him. Create a new metrics-router-specific Service identity and ownership runbook entry; update the existing Rotation handoff, metrics-router canary, and metrics-router on-call handoff runbooks; update the existing Mosaic capacity-response document and December 5 Metrics-router ownership review calendar event with this decision and the preserved boundaries; and post the concise bounded summary to the Infra Slack channel.

Message 003319 in history

Fact 185

Wes owns routine metrics-router implementation, production operations, release and rollback decisions, and owner-led-window opening decisions under the existing deploy-pipeline, canary, health-return, stop, and rollback rules.

Source evidence (1)

003319Dec 5, 2025 / 11:28 UTC-05:00

The metrics-router ownership review with Hema, Wes, and me is complete. Based on Wes's first-pass canary decisions, repeated safe owner-led-window work, maintenance of the tenant-bounded queue slice and diagnostics, the September rollout, and his operation of the October 6 Mosaic Commerce ramp, we decided to change the formal ownership record effective today. Wes is now metrics-router primary and I'm the backup. He owns routine metrics-router implementation, production operations, release and rollback decisions, and decisions to open owner-led windows under the existing deploy-pipeline, canary, health-return, stop, and rollback rules. I no longer need to make every fresh opening decision, though I may make one while covering for an unavailable Wes. I remain the architectural reviewer and escalation path only when a cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exception is triggered, rather than gating ordinary metrics-router windows. The accepted-batch diagnostic remains qualified for prospective production observation, but it does not retroactively establish whether any accepted batch was lost on October 6. The broader Mosaic scale-response cycle remains open, and no capacity-related production window is open or authorized. The Infra on-call roster is unchanged, and ingest-edge and shard-keeper ownership are unchanged. Shard-keeper remains outside Wes's solo scope unless I or the Cyrus-team backup explicitly pairs with him. Create a new metrics-router-specific Service identity and ownership runbook entry; update the existing Rotation handoff, metrics-router canary, and metrics-router on-call handoff runbooks; update the existing Mosaic capacity-response document and December 5 Metrics-router ownership review calendar event with this decision and the preserved boundaries; and post the concise bounded summary to the Infra Slack channel.

Message 003319 in history

Fact 186

Effective December 5, 2025, Alex Valdez is the metrics-router backup and may decide to open an owner-led window when covering for an unavailable Wes.

Source evidence (1)

003319Dec 5, 2025 / 11:28 UTC-05:00

The metrics-router ownership review with Hema, Wes, and me is complete. Based on Wes's first-pass canary decisions, repeated safe owner-led-window work, maintenance of the tenant-bounded queue slice and diagnostics, the September rollout, and his operation of the October 6 Mosaic Commerce ramp, we decided to change the formal ownership record effective today. Wes is now metrics-router primary and I'm the backup. He owns routine metrics-router implementation, production operations, release and rollback decisions, and decisions to open owner-led windows under the existing deploy-pipeline, canary, health-return, stop, and rollback rules. I no longer need to make every fresh opening decision, though I may make one while covering for an unavailable Wes. I remain the architectural reviewer and escalation path only when a cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exception is triggered, rather than gating ordinary metrics-router windows. The accepted-batch diagnostic remains qualified for prospective production observation, but it does not retroactively establish whether any accepted batch was lost on October 6. The broader Mosaic scale-response cycle remains open, and no capacity-related production window is open or authorized. The Infra on-call roster is unchanged, and ingest-edge and shard-keeper ownership are unchanged. Shard-keeper remains outside Wes's solo scope unless I or the Cyrus-team backup explicitly pairs with him. Create a new metrics-router-specific Service identity and ownership runbook entry; update the existing Rotation handoff, metrics-router canary, and metrics-router on-call handoff runbooks; update the existing Mosaic capacity-response document and December 5 Metrics-router ownership review calendar event with this decision and the preserved boundaries; and post the concise bounded summary to the Infra Slack channel.

Message 003319 in history

Fact 187

Alex Valdez is the metrics-router architectural reviewer and escalation path only for triggered cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exceptions; he no longer gates ordinary metrics-router windows.

Source evidence (1)

003319Dec 5, 2025 / 11:28 UTC-05:00

The metrics-router ownership review with Hema, Wes, and me is complete. Based on Wes's first-pass canary decisions, repeated safe owner-led-window work, maintenance of the tenant-bounded queue slice and diagnostics, the September rollout, and his operation of the October 6 Mosaic Commerce ramp, we decided to change the formal ownership record effective today. Wes is now metrics-router primary and I'm the backup. He owns routine metrics-router implementation, production operations, release and rollback decisions, and decisions to open owner-led windows under the existing deploy-pipeline, canary, health-return, stop, and rollback rules. I no longer need to make every fresh opening decision, though I may make one while covering for an unavailable Wes. I remain the architectural reviewer and escalation path only when a cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exception is triggered, rather than gating ordinary metrics-router windows. The accepted-batch diagnostic remains qualified for prospective production observation, but it does not retroactively establish whether any accepted batch was lost on October 6. The broader Mosaic scale-response cycle remains open, and no capacity-related production window is open or authorized. The Infra on-call roster is unchanged, and ingest-edge and shard-keeper ownership are unchanged. Shard-keeper remains outside Wes's solo scope unless I or the Cyrus-team backup explicitly pairs with him. Create a new metrics-router-specific Service identity and ownership runbook entry; update the existing Rotation handoff, metrics-router canary, and metrics-router on-call handoff runbooks; update the existing Mosaic capacity-response document and December 5 Metrics-router ownership review calendar event with this decision and the preserved boundaries; and post the concise bounded summary to the Infra Slack channel.

Message 003319 in history

Expected tool calls

  • send_slack_dm

Grading

1. field_equals / send_slack_dm
{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "tool": "send_slack_dm",
  "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
  "path": "result.ok",
  "value": true,
  "check_id": "alex_144_00"
}
2. field_equals / send_slack_dm
{
  "type": "field_equals",
  "path": "result.user",
  "value": "morgan",
  "tool": "send_slack_dm",
  "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
  "check_id": "alex_144_01"
}
3. field_llm_judge / send_slack_dm
{
  "type": "field_llm_judge",
  "path": "result.message",
  "criterion": "The DM routes the routine opening decision to Wes as current metrics-router primary. It says the sender is the backup when Wes is unavailable and otherwise reviews only triggered cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exceptions, so this normal no-exception request does not require the sender's approval. Referring back to those listed conditions as \"those exceptions\" is sufficient.",
  "tool": "send_slack_dm",
  "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
  "check_id": "alex_144_02"
}
Complete grading specification
{
  "type": "tool_trace",
  "config": {
    "check_version": 2,
    "today": "2028-01-01",
    "assertions": [
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "tool": "send_slack_dm",
        "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
        "path": "result.ok",
        "value": true,
        "check_id": "alex_144_00"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_equals",
        "path": "result.user",
        "value": "morgan",
        "tool": "send_slack_dm",
        "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
        "check_id": "alex_144_01"
      },
      {
        "type": "field_llm_judge",
        "path": "result.message",
        "criterion": "The DM routes the routine opening decision to Wes as current metrics-router primary. It says the sender is the backup when Wes is unavailable and otherwise reviews only triggered cross-service invariant, provenance, or failure-mode exceptions, so this normal no-exception request does not require the sender's approval. Referring back to those listed conditions as \"those exceptions\" is sufficient.",
        "tool": "send_slack_dm",
        "action_id": "alex_144_send_slack_dm",
        "check_id": "alex_144_02"
      }
    ]
  }
}
App stateDownload JSON
Source file

tests/alex/144.yaml

SHA-256: 32057be6090c380dff35a06b8afad3aa72b9852354a9e2d82a83051a18e29520