id: '171'
narrative_anchor_date: '2028-01-01'
test: Create a short evidence-lock note for the calibration appendix on Ines’s and Daniela’s distinct
  Q3 2025 contributions. Clearly separate the messaging-governance interventions from the source-reliability
  intervention, record what was prevented before operator exposure, and state whether rollback was used.
load_bearing_facts:
- 131
- 132
expected_tool_calls:
- create_doc
grade:
  type: tool_trace
  config:
    check_version: 2
    today: '2028-01-01'
    semantic_judge_version: 2
    assertions:
    - type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_evidence_lock_note
      path: result.ok
      value: true
      check_id: riley_171_00
    - type: field_llm_judge
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_evidence_lock_note
      path: args
      criterion: 'The note clearly attributes to Ines two messaging-governance interventions involving
        two internal draft instructions that incorrectly treated verified external authority as blanket
        contact permission, and states that both instructions were corrected before either reached operators.
        Missing the number of instructions, the nature of the error, the attribution to Ines, or the prevention
        timing must fail.


        The note separately attributes to Daniela the source-reliability contribution: the August 14 source-age
        warning was the only pre-breach intervention in the locked evidence, and no rollback was used.
        It must not conflate this intervention with Ines’s draft-instruction corrections.'
      check_id: riley_171_01
mock_state: {}