id: '134'
narrative_anchor_date: '2028-01-01'
test: Create a compact, self-contained QA training case from the June 12 Q2 board-evidence source-completeness
  packet. Show that source completeness and claim readiness are separate judgments, identify the sections
  that passed source-completeness review, explain the maturity-dependent exception including its cohort
  type and size and available leading read, and state the limits of what the packet decided. Title the
  document `Board-source QA case — Q2 source completeness vs claim readiness`.
load_bearing_facts:
- 204
- 202
- 203
expected_tool_calls:
- create_doc
grade:
  type: tool_trace
  config:
    check_version: 2
    today: '2028-01-01'
    semantic_judge_version: 2
    assertions:
    - type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: qa_case_doc
      path: result.ok
      value: true
      check_id: riley_134_00
    - check_id: riley_134_01
      type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: qa_case_doc
      path: args.title
      value: Board-source QA case — Q2 source completeness vs claim readiness
    - type: field_llm_judge
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: qa_case_doc
      path: args
      criterion: 'The document identifies Expansion Assist, pricing-page path quality, and CS auto-nudge
        as the three source-complete sections, and conveys that each had its required source owner, denominator
        or exact coverage fields, measurement limits, exclusions, and reliability-evidence location, with
        no required source field missing. Missing any section or materially misstating why it was source-complete
        must fail.


        The document states that Helio Start had a fixed paid cohort of exactly 50 workspaces and a complete
        leading read of exactly 39 of 50 reaching first integration by day 7, while its mature customer-outcome
        row remained incomplete because all 50 did not yet have complete day-90 windows. It must not portray
        the day-7 result as a mature outcome.


        The document clearly teaches that source completeness and claim or board readiness are separate
        judgments, and states that the June 12 packet itself made no claim, closed no lane, and made no
        board-readiness decision. Any assertion that the packet approved a claim, closed a lane, or declared
        board readiness must fail.'
      check_id: riley_134_02
mock_state: {}