id: '106'
narrative_anchor_date: '2028-01-01'
test: Create a short historical comparison note for new board-operations reviewers explaining why Helio
  Start was excluded from the approved Q1 and Q2 2026 quarterly operating-evidence sections. For Q1, state
  what the evidence meant for Q2 forecast credit. For Q2, state what the day-7 result did and did not
  establish. Preserve the approved interpretation of the other three lanes in each package, and make the
  quarter-specific distinction clear rather than describing both exclusions as generic immaturity.
load_bearing_facts:
- 182
- 183
- 185
- 210
- 211
- 212
- 213
expected_tool_calls:
- create_doc
grade:
  type: tool_trace
  config:
    check_version: 2
    today: '2028-01-01'
    semantic_judge_version: 2
    assertions:
    - type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: historical_comparison_note
      path: result.ok
      value: true
      check_id: riley_106_00
    - type: field_llm_judge
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: historical_comparison_note
      path: args
      criterion: 'The note says Helio Start was excluded from the Q1 2026 section because its two qualifying
        mature cohorts permitted consideration of a capped proposal but its row lacked the exact cohort
        dates required for board readiness; at that time there was no paid traffic, approved budget, or
        acquisition evidence, and no Q2 forecast credit followed. It says Helio Start was excluded from
        the Q2 2026 section because the fixed 50-workspace cohort did not yet have complete day-90 paid-active
        status, refund-adjusted collected cash, and account-level support effort, and its 39-of-50 day-7
        first-integration result supported no growth or forecast statement. For both quarters it preserves
        the three included lanes: Expansion Assist as descriptive rather than causal evidence, pricing-page
        path quality as post-rollout continuity rather than a new causal test, and CS auto-nudge as system-control
        evidence. It also says the Q2 Expansion Assist lane had no revenue, pipeline, or forecast treatment.'
      check_id: riley_106_01
mock_state: {}