id: '064'
narrative_anchor_date: '2028-01-01'
test: Create a short internal two-lane routing card for CS auto-nudge explanations and escalations. Use
  the current authority boundaries from our prior decisions, make the two routes easy to scan, and keep
  it focused on explanation routing rather than turning it into a broader role or authority map.
load_bearing_facts:
- 116
- 117
expected_tool_calls:
- create_doc
grade:
  type: tool_trace
  config:
    check_version: 2
    today: '2028-01-01'
    semantic_judge_version: 2
    assertions:
    - type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_routing_card
      path: result.ok
      value: true
      check_id: riley_064_00
    - type: field_llm_judge
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_routing_card
      path: args
      criterion: 'The title clearly identifies the document as a routing card or guide for CS auto-nudge
        explanations and escalations.


        The body is a compact, easy-to-scan card with two clearly distinguishable routes: one for routine
        operating explanations and one for matters requiring escalation. Missing either route fails.


        The routine operating-explanation route clearly directs CS auto-nudge operating explanations to
        Owen and does not assign those routine explanations to Riley.


        The escalation route clearly directs disputed semantics, cross-surface consequences, and executive
        claims to Riley. All three categories must be covered, and the card must not give Owen final authority
        over them.'
      check_id: riley_064_01
mock_state: {}
