id: '051'
narrative_anchor_date: '2028-01-01'
test: I'm cleaning up the Q2 planning archive. Create a concise activation-target note dated April 5,
  2023 that clearly separates the target that remained active for Q2 from the higher small-business-tier
  planning target and the condition that would have triggered it. Make it explicit which number should
  remain on the Q2 deck, and do not present the future scenario as an already-approved current target.
load_bearing_facts:
- 356
- 357
expected_tool_calls:
- create_doc
grade:
  type: tool_trace
  config:
    check_version: 2
    today: '2028-01-01'
    semantic_judge_version: 2
    assertions:
    - type: field_equals
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_activation_target_note
      path: result.ok
      value: true
      check_id: riley_051_00
    - type: field_llm_judge
      tool: create_doc
      action_id: create_activation_target_note
      path: args
      criterion: 'Across the title or body, the note is clearly dated April 5, 2023.


        The document clearly states that the Q2 activation target remained unchanged at 60% and that 60%
        is the number that should remain on the Q2 deck.


        The document clearly states that 65% was only a conditional small-business-tier planning target,
        applicable if the sub-50-seat tier actually shipped in Q3, and distinguishes it from the current
        Q2 target rather than presenting it as already approved or active.'
      check_id: riley_051_01
mock_state: {}